Chandler · usage
← Back to sessions ← Back to this session

Prompt

How many paying partners do we have?

Outcome
success
Cost
$12.5163
excludes embeddings
Latency
100.8 s
Query attempts
1
Rows returned
1
Tokens
1,465,145 / 8,540
in / out

Request

request_id
0e0de589-9ad3-4fc4-9ff2-bd62343f13a1
When
2026-10-01 09:09
Tool
ask
User
mihail.iliev@dext.com · Mihail Iliev
Identity
google
Session
f625c317-5c7d-4e6e-8148-303004f8af81
Model
gpt-5.6-sol

Route taken

Topic
Bookings
Omni model
e407bba6-4fae-4079-ac4e-cd6cf8fdf6f8
Match method
agent loop
Nudge shown
disclaimer
Question shape
lookup
Caveat raised
—
Sharper question offered
—
Shown to user
Basis: Distinct Partner accounts with an active paid Dext subscription, latest available snapshot. Governed filters applied.
Chandler is still young and makes mistakes in his calculations sometimes — reach out to the Data & Analytics team in #analytics-questions-and-alerts if you have questions.

Per-step detail — each LLM call, each Omni request, each rejected draft — is traced to stdout only and is not stored, so it cannot be shown here. Query attempts counts run_query executions, not model turns.

SQL that ran

WITH booking_snapshot_grain AS (
  SELECT
    omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."DERIVED_ACCOUNT_ID" AS "Partner Account ID",
    omni_dbt__eds_bookings."PRIMARY_KEY" AS "Booking Primary Key",
    MAX(omni_dbt__eds_bookings."HAS_PAID_SUBSCRIPTION") AS "Has Paid Subscription"
  FROM PROD."EDS_ALL_ACCOUNTS" AS omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts
INNER JOIN PROD."EDS_CALENDAR_DAY" AS omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day
  ON omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" >= omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."VALID_FROM" AND omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" <= omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."VALID_TO"
LEFT JOIN PROD."EDS_BOOKINGS" AS omni_dbt__eds_bookings
  ON omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."DERIVED_ACCOUNT_ID" = omni_dbt__eds_bookings."DERIVED_ACCOUNT_ID" AND omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" >= omni_dbt__eds_bookings."VALID_FROM" AND omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" <= omni_dbt__eds_bookings."VALID_TO"
  WHERE omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."IS_LATEST_AVAILABLE_DATE" = TRUE
    AND omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" >= DATEADD('month', -6, CURRENT_DATE())
    AND omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" < CURRENT_DATE()
    AND omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" = DATE_TRUNC('month', omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day."DATE_DAY" + INTERVAL '1 month') - INTERVAL '1 day'
    AND omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."FINANCE_ACCOUNT_TYPE" = 'Accountant'
    AND COALESCE(omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."IS_DEXT_DEMO", FALSE) = FALSE
    AND omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."FRANCHISE_NAME" IS NULL
    AND (omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."SALESFORCE_ACCOUNT_TYPE" != 'Reseller' OR omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."SALESFORCE_ACCOUNT_TYPE" IS NULL)
  GROUP BY
    omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."DERIVED_ACCOUNT_ID",
    omni_dbt__eds_bookings."PRIMARY_KEY"
),
paying_partner_snapshot AS (
  SELECT
    "Partner Account ID" AS "Partner Account ID"
  FROM booking_snapshot_grain
  GROUP BY "Partner Account ID"
  HAVING MAX(CASE WHEN "Has Paid Subscription" = TRUE THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 1
)
SELECT
  COUNT(DISTINCT "Partner Account ID") AS "Paying Partners"
FROM paying_partner_snapshot
LIMIT 1

Feedback

WhenRatingComment
2026-10-01 09:13 neutral User reports a mismatch: Omni shows 11,046 paying partners vs Chandler's 11,172 (difference of 126). Cause not yet determined.

Cost is the LLM completion spend LiteLLM priced for each call, summed per request. Chandler is running on the Codex CLI, which draws ChatGPT plan quota rather than per-token API billing, so this figure is not money paid — it is what the same traffic would have cost on the API, priced from the token counts Codex reports. Read it as the size of the bill avoided. Two known limits: embedding spend is not recorded, so retrieval and matching cost is missing, and because the figure is one sum per request it cannot be split by model within a request — a request's classifier and agent calls can use different models while llm_model holds only one name. Only authenticated calls are logged, USAGE_LOG_ENABLED can switch logging off, and log writes are fail-soft — this is not a complete record of traffic. Questions are grouped into sessions: a session is exact when the caller echoed its id back to us and otherwise inferred from a 30-minute gap in that user’s activity, so a grouping is only as good as the source shown on the session itself. A call with no attributable user gets no session at all; those questions are listed separately rather than dropped.