Chandler · usage
← Back to sessions ← Back to this session

Prompt

How many sales invoices were created (raised) in Dext's sales invoice creation feature in the last 12 months, split by country (UK vs France)?

Outcome
success
Cost
$153.8385
excludes embeddings
Latency
316.6 s
Query attempts
4
Rows returned
1
Tokens
18,890,710 / 70,235
in / out

Request

request_id
1431c9b5-301b-49d2-bae0-bb76b6d805dc
When
2026-09-27 12:49
Tool
ask
User
gerty.bester@dext.com · Gerty Bester
Identity
google
Session
de953512-dbbe-4472-a744-34e140fddb60
Model
gpt-5.6-sol

Route taken

Topic
Product Usage - Users
Omni model
e407bba6-4fae-4079-ac4e-cd6cf8fdf6f8
Match method
agent loop
Nudge shown
—
Question shape
lookup
Caveat raised
degenerate_column
Sharper question offered
—
Shown to user
Basis: Availability check for sales-invoice-created events in Dext's account-user activity data, All available event dates.
Every row's «First Sales Invoice Date» came back empty. That is usually a wrong field or join rather than missing data.

Per-step detail — each LLM call, each Omni request, each rejected draft — is traced to stdout only and is not stored, so it cannot be shown here. Query attempts counts run_query executions, not model turns.

SQL that ran

SELECT
  MIN(omni_dbt__eds_prepare_account_user_event_activity."OCCURRED_DATE") AS "First Sales Invoice Date",
  MAX(omni_dbt__eds_prepare_account_user_event_activity."OCCURRED_DATE") AS "Last Sales Invoice Date",
  SUM(omni_dbt__eds_prepare_account_user_event_activity."SALES_INVOICE_CREATED_VOLUME") AS "Volume of Sales Invoices Created"
FROM PROD."EDS_PREPARE_ACCOUNT_USER_EVENT_ACTIVITY" AS omni_dbt__eds_prepare_account_user_event_activity
WHERE omni_dbt__eds_prepare_account_user_event_activity."SALES_INVOICE_CREATED_VOLUME" > 0
LIMIT 1

Feedback

No feedback linked to this request.

Cost is the LLM completion spend LiteLLM priced for each call, summed per request. Chandler is running on the Codex CLI, which draws ChatGPT plan quota rather than per-token API billing, so this figure is not money paid — it is what the same traffic would have cost on the API, priced from the token counts Codex reports. Read it as the size of the bill avoided. Two known limits: embedding spend is not recorded, so retrieval and matching cost is missing, and because the figure is one sum per request it cannot be split by model within a request — a request's classifier and agent calls can use different models while llm_model holds only one name. Only authenticated calls are logged, USAGE_LOG_ENABLED can switch logging off, and log writes are fail-soft — this is not a complete record of traffic. Questions are grouped into sessions: a session is exact when the caller echoed its id back to us and otherwise inferred from a 30-minute gap in that user’s activity, so a grouping is only as good as the source shown on the session itself. A call with no attributable user gets no session at all; those questions are listed separately rather than dropped.