That practice client-count table hit a 5,000-row limit and I need full coverage (~40k+ parent accounts, or at minimum all accountant practices). Please rerun the same query (client accounts grouped by parent_account_crn, count of distinct accounts) with the limit raised high enough to return every parent_account_crn, sorted by client count descending. Also: your query filtered number_of_days = 90 — does that mean the count is only clients active in the last 90 days, or is it the full current client book? I want the full current client book per practice.
Per-step detail — each LLM call, each Omni request, each rejected draft —
is traced to stdout only and is not stored, so it cannot be shown here.
Query attempts counts run_query executions, not model turns.
{
"calculations": [],
"fields": [
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.parent_account_crn",
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.total_clients"
],
"filters": {
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.finance_account_type": {
"kind": "EQUALS",
"type": "string",
"values": [
"Corporate"
]
},
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.has_dext_parent": {
"is_negative": false,
"type": "boolean"
},
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.is_dext_demo": {
"is_negative": true,
"treat_nulls_as_false": false,
"type": "boolean"
},
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.is_suspended_dext": {
"is_negative": true,
"treat_nulls_as_false": false,
"type": "boolean"
},
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.number_of_days": {
"kind": "EQUALS",
"type": "number",
"values": [
90
]
},
"omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.salesforce_account_type": {
"is_negative": true,
"kind": "EQUALS",
"type": "string",
"values": [
"Reseller"
]
},
"omni_dbt__eds_calendar_day.is_latest_available_date": {
"is_negative": false,
"type": "boolean"
}
},
"limit": 100000,
"modelId": "e407bba6-4fae-4079-ac4e-cd6cf8fdf6f8",
"pivots": [],
"sorts": [
{
"column_name": "omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.total_clients",
"sort_descending": true
},
{
"column_name": "omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts.parent_account_crn",
"sort_descending": false
}
],
"table": "omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts"
}
No feedback linked to this request.
Cost is the LLM completion spend LiteLLM priced for each call, summed per
request.
Chandler is running on the Codex CLI, which draws ChatGPT plan quota
rather than per-token API billing, so this figure is not money paid —
it is what the same traffic would have cost on the API, priced from the
token counts Codex reports. Read it as the size of the bill avoided.
Two known limits: embedding spend is not recorded, so
retrieval and matching cost is missing, and because the figure is one sum
per request it cannot be split by model within a request — a
request's classifier and agent calls can use different models while
llm_model holds only one name.
Only authenticated calls are logged, USAGE_LOG_ENABLED can
switch logging off, and log writes are fail-soft — this is not a complete
record of traffic. Questions are grouped into sessions: a session is
exact when the caller echoed its id back to us and otherwise inferred from
a 30-minute gap in that user’s activity, so a grouping is only as
good as the source shown on the session itself. A call with no
attributable user gets no session at all; those questions are listed
separately rather than dropped.