Chandler · usage
← Back to sessions ← Back to this session

Prompt

Give me the exact definition, description, and any filters/criteria for the NECE field as defined in Product Usage - Accounts.topic.yaml

Outcome
success
Cost
$0.0142
excludes embeddings
Latency
10.0 s
Query attempts
0
Rows returned
—
Tokens
2,903 / 185
in / out

Request

request_id
e5be185b-33ff-435e-a550-c26956c7c115
When
2026-09-11 13:47
Tool
ask
User
suzannah.weinfass@dext.com · Suzannah Weinfass
Identity
google
Session
ea54ccfc-654f-4b4a-91d9-7388f4f3c6d2
Model
gpt-5.6-sol

Route taken

Topic
—
Omni model
—
Match method
agent loop
Nudge shown
—
Question shape
not classified
Caveat raised
—
Sharper question offered
—

Per-step detail — each LLM call, each Omni request, each rejected draft — is traced to stdout only and is not stored, so it cannot be shown here. Query attempts counts run_query executions, not model turns.

Feedback

WhenRatingComment
2026-09-11 13:49 negative Follow-up to request_id 88a3514d (earlier feedback: NECE not found despite being defined in Product Usage - Accounts.topic.yaml). After that feedback, a retry (request_id 0630408d) silently resolved NECE to a query labeled "Attached Corporate Clients" — filtering only on account status flags (Corporate type, has Dext parent, not suspended/demo/reseller), with no usage/engagement criteria despite "Engaged" apparently being part of what NECE stands for. Immediately after, asking Chandler to state the definition/filters it had just used for NECE (request_id e5be185b) returned "NECE not defined" again. This is inconsistent across three calls in the same session: not defined -> silently mapped to a plausible-but-unverified query -> not defined again. The user flagged the resulting numbers (770k-810k) as implausibly high, likely because "attached" (linked account) and "engaged" (actual usage) are being conflated. Please have someone confirm the correct NECE definition/filters against Product Usage - Accounts.topic.yaml and check why resolution is unstable across identical/near-identical queries in one session.

Cost is the LLM completion spend LiteLLM priced for each call, summed per request. Chandler is running on the Codex CLI, which draws ChatGPT plan quota rather than per-token API billing, so this figure is not money paid — it is what the same traffic would have cost on the API, priced from the token counts Codex reports. Read it as the size of the bill avoided. Two known limits: embedding spend is not recorded, so retrieval and matching cost is missing, and because the figure is one sum per request it cannot be split by model within a request — a request's classifier and agent calls can use different models while llm_model holds only one name. Only authenticated calls are logged, USAGE_LOG_ENABLED can switch logging off, and log writes are fail-soft — this is not a complete record of traffic. Questions are grouped into sessions: a session is exact when the caller echoed its id back to us and otherwise inferred from a 30-minute gap in that user’s activity, so a grouping is only as good as the source shown on the session itself. A call with no attributable user gets no session at all; those questions are listed separately rather than dropped.