Chandler · usage
← Back to sessions ← Back to this session

Prompt

How many accounts have improving sentiment?

Outcome
success
Cost
$4.0633
excludes embeddings
Latency
161.5 s
Query attempts
1
Rows returned
1
Tokens
3,402,125 / 5,456
in / out

Request

request_id
f2da64b8-2719-4433-bc33-1a9cdcce4200
When
2026-09-10 15:21
Tool
ask
User
suzannah.weinfass@dext.com · Suzannah Weinfass
Identity
google
Session
4956b00b-4cfd-4f56-9e4d-9bc442267270
Model
gpt-5.6-sol

Route taken

Topic
NPS
Omni model
e407bba6-4fae-4079-ac4e-cd6cf8fdf6f8
Match method
agent loop
Nudge shown
—
Question shape
not classified
Caveat raised
—
Sharper question offered
—

Per-step detail — each LLM call, each Omni request, each rejected draft — is traced to stdout only and is not stored, so it cannot be shown here. Query attempts counts run_query executions, not model turns.

SQL that ran

WITH ranked_responses AS (
  SELECT
    omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."ACCOUNT_CRN" AS account_crn,
    omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."USER_CRN" AS user_crn,
    omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."RESPONSE_SCORE" AS response_score,
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (
      PARTITION BY
        omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."ACCOUNT_CRN",
        omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."USER_CRN"
      ORDER BY omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."OCCURRED_AT" DESC
    ) AS response_rank
  FROM PROD."PREPARE_INTERCOM_NPS_SCORES" AS omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores
  INNER JOIN PROD."EDS_ALL_ACCOUNTS" AS omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts
    ON omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."DERIVED_ACCOUNT_ID" = omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."ACCOUNT_CRN"
        and CAST(omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."OCCURRED_AT" AS DATE) between omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."VALID_FROM" and omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."VALID_TO" 
  WHERE omni_dbt__prepare_intercom_nps_scores."RESPONSE_SCORE" IS NOT NULL
    AND COALESCE(omni_dbt__eds_all_accounts."IS_DEXT_DEMO", FALSE) = FALSE
),
user_changes AS (
  SELECT
    account_crn,
    user_crn,
    MAX(CASE WHEN response_rank = 1 THEN response_score END) AS latest_score,
    MAX(CASE WHEN response_rank = 2 THEN response_score END) AS previous_score
  FROM ranked_responses
  WHERE response_rank <= 2
  GROUP BY account_crn, user_crn
  HAVING COUNT(*) = 2
)
SELECT
  COUNT(DISTINCT CASE
    WHEN latest_score > previous_score THEN account_crn
  END) AS "Accounts With Improving Sentiment"
FROM user_changes
LIMIT 1

Feedback

No feedback linked to this request.

Cost is the LLM completion spend LiteLLM priced for each call, summed per request. Chandler is running on the Codex CLI, which draws ChatGPT plan quota rather than per-token API billing, so this figure is not money paid — it is what the same traffic would have cost on the API, priced from the token counts Codex reports. Read it as the size of the bill avoided. Two known limits: embedding spend is not recorded, so retrieval and matching cost is missing, and because the figure is one sum per request it cannot be split by model within a request — a request's classifier and agent calls can use different models while llm_model holds only one name. Only authenticated calls are logged, USAGE_LOG_ENABLED can switch logging off, and log writes are fail-soft — this is not a complete record of traffic. Questions are grouped into sessions: a session is exact when the caller echoed its id back to us and otherwise inferred from a 30-minute gap in that user’s activity, so a grouping is only as good as the source shown on the session itself. A call with no attributable user gets no session at all; those questions are listed separately rather than dropped.