Chandler · usage
← Back to sessions

Session

User
pawel.chwieros@dext.com · Pawel Chwieros
Started
2026-09-24 13:38
Last activity
2026-09-24 13:38
Questions
1
Grouping
time_gap — inferred — consecutive questions from this user with no long gap
session_id
4dcad2d3-8933-4588-bffd-d513e8099687

Transcript

  1. 2026-09-24 13:38 ask success $0.3279 17.4 s full detail →
    Is there a measure for number of clients or subscriptions on a partner account, and a measure for account total MRR or a size band? I want to split client limit upsell by partner size and calculate revenue per client added.
    The provided documentation does not include a measure for the number of clients or subscriptions on a Partner account, total account MRR, client-limit upsell, or revenue per client added. It does provide `parent_all_accounts.firm_tier` in the **Product Usage - Users** topic as the required Partner/Parent practice-size band. Partner revenue should use Monthly ACV, not MRR, but no Monthly ACV field is documented here; therefore, the requested analysis cannot be calculated accurately from these excerpts. - Partner size band: `parent_all_accounts.firm_tier` - Client/subscription count measure: not documented - Partner revenue measure: Monthly ACV required; field not documented - Formula, once fields are available: revenue associated with client-limit upsell ÷ number of clients added; treat nulls as missing and do not divide by zero - Required Partner filters: Accountant accounts only, exclude Dext demos and Resellers, use month-end snapshots, and default to the last 6 completed months unless overridden Please contact the Analytics team to identify the missing client/subscription-count, Monthly ACV, and upsell fields and confirm a topic where their joins align without double counting. Possible follow-ups: - Which topic contains Partner Monthly ACV and client/subscription-count measures? - How should client-limit upsell revenue be attributed to clients added? Warning: This answer was generated by AI and should be double-checked.

Cost is the LLM completion spend LiteLLM priced for each call, summed per request. Chandler is running on the Codex CLI, which draws ChatGPT plan quota rather than per-token API billing, so this figure is not money paid — it is what the same traffic would have cost on the API, priced from the token counts Codex reports. Read it as the size of the bill avoided. Two known limits: embedding spend is not recorded, so retrieval and matching cost is missing, and because the figure is one sum per request it cannot be split by model within a request — a request's classifier and agent calls can use different models while llm_model holds only one name. Only authenticated calls are logged, USAGE_LOG_ENABLED can switch logging off, and log writes are fail-soft — this is not a complete record of traffic. Questions are grouped into sessions: a session is exact when the caller echoed its id back to us and otherwise inferred from a 30-minute gap in that user’s activity, so a grouping is only as good as the source shown on the session itself. A call with no attributable user gets no session at all; those questions are listed separately rather than dropped.